UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO VARIETY TRIALS, Aberdeen, Idaho, 1998
EXPERIMENTAL TRANSGENIC VARIETIES
November 2,1998
Root1
Yield		 Sugar
Content		 Gross
Sugar
K
Na		 Amino
N		 Recoverable
Sugar

Estimated
Recoverable Sugar

Curly Top2
Rating
VARIETY (T/A) (%) (lbs/A) (meq/100g) (meq/100g) (meq/100g) (%) (lbs/T) (lbs/A) 1998
 
ACH 211 Check3,4 35.33 17.13 12079 41.52 15.08 40.83 15.87 317.4 11183 3.7
Beta 7CG9236LL 39.67 17.76 14065 51.69 12.03 28.38 16.56 331.2 13109 5.1
Beta 8422 Check3,4 40.37 17.48 14106 48.61 12.11 33.46 16.26 325.2 13117 3.7
Beta 8757 40.11 17.08 13704 49.69 14.59 31.14 15.85 317.0 12717 3.4
Beta 8757LL 41.18 17.35 14277 49.51 13.35 29.19 16.16 323.1 13290 3.6
HM 108 RR 39.64 16.55 13125 50.37 13.43 35.94 15.26 305.2 12099 3.6
HM Owyhee Check3,4 39.42 16.89 13311 45.52 9.74 29.71 15.78 315.6 12439 3.1
HM Pillar RR 38.17 16.71 12749 48.25 13.97 26.19 15.56 311.2 11874 3.7
HM Pillar 37.67 16.98 12791 46.19 10.80 28.67 15.87 317.4 11952 3.1
HM PM21 Check3,4 39.22 17.18 13488 42.64 7.26 26.33 16.18 323.6 12709 3.6
 
Susceptible Check 5.5
US 41 3.6
 
LSD (5%) 2.32 0.62 825 3.52 4.35 N.S N.S N.S 835
CV (%) 5.8 3.6 6.1 7.3 35.0 6.6
Pr>F 0.003 0.0093 0.0001 0.0001 0.015 0.14 0.085 0.085 0.0001
 

When comparing yields or sugars of two varieties, the values must differ by a value equal to or greater than the LSD given at the
bottom of each column. If they do not, then they were probably not different in this test.

1 Root yields have been tared 5%.
2 Curly Top Ratings: 0 = no curly top symptoms; 9 = plants killed. To calculate and compare the average curly top resistance of two or
   more varieties, use only those years data in which the compared varieties all have ratings.
3 Commercial check varieties.
4 Commercial seed obtained locally.
UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO VARIETY TRIALS, Kimberly, Idaho, 1998
EXPERIMENTAL TRANSGENIC VARIETIES
November 2,1998
Root1
Yield		 Sugar
Content		 Gross
Sugar
K
Na		 Amino
N		 Recoverable
Sugar		 Estimated
Recoverable Sugar 		Curly Top2
Rating
VARIETY (T/A) (%) (lbs/A) (meq/100g) (meq/100g) (meq/100g) (%) (lbs/T) (lbs/A) 1998
 
ACH 211 Check3 38.24 15.35 11731 5.17 1.84 4.55 15.20 304.0 11617 3.7
Beta 7CG9236LL 40.09 15.76 12633 5.29 1.68 4.07 15.62 312.4 12518 5.1
Beta 8422 Check3 41.19 15.53 12791 5.34 1.72 4.38 15.38 307.6 12669 3.7
Beta 8757LL 41.70 15.46 12890 5.43 1.75 4.42 15.31 306.2 12765 3.6
HM 108 RR 41.25 15.47 12756 5.50 1.44 4.45 15.32 306.4 12634 3.6
HM Owyee Check3 40.74 15.60 12707 5.29 1.35 4.03 15.46 309.2 12594 3.1
HM Pillar RR 38.07 15.36 11708 5.13 1.94 3.76 15.22 304.5 11602 3.1
HM PM21 Check3 39.87 15.60 12437 5.26 1.29 3.98 15.47 309.3 12328 3.6
 
Susceptible Check 5.5
US 41 3.6
LSD (5%) 1.97 N.S 636 N.S N.S N.S N.S N.S 606
CV (%) 4.7 N.S. 4.9 5.2
Pr>F 0.003 0.63 0.001 0.095 0.0001 0.14 0.51 0.51 0.0027
 

When comparing yields or sugars of two varieties, the values must differ by a value equal to or greater than the LSD given at the
bottom of each column.  If they do not, then they were probably not different in this test.

1 Root yields have been tared 5%.
2 Curly Top Ratings: 0 = no curly top symptoms; 9 = plants killed. To calculate and compare the average curly top resistance of two or
   more varieties,   use only those years data in which the compared varieties all have ratings.
3 Commercial check varieties.
4 Commercial seed obtained locally.


Last Updated on 12/29/98
By District III Extension

Back to Sugarbeet Home Page