History and Analysis
of
Federally Administered Lands
in Idaho
by
Jay O'Laughlin,1
Wyatt R. Hundrup,2
and
Philip S. Cook 3
Report No. 16
Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Policy Analysis Group
University of Idaho
June 1998
1 Dr. O'Laughlin is Director, Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Policy Analysis Group, University of Idaho, Moscow. As Professor, Department of Forest Resources, he teaches courses in natural resource policy. As a member of the Society of American Foresters he led a team that prepared comments on the 1997 draft proposal by federal agencies to implement ecosystem-based mangement on federally administered lands in Idaho. In 1996 he was appointed by the Idaho State Board of Land Commissioners as a member of the Federal Lands Task Force.
2 Wyatt R. Hundrup is a half-time Research Assistant with the Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Policy Analysis Group. He has a B.S. in wildlife resource management from the University of Idaho. During 1997 he attended many meetings of the Idaho State Board of Land Commissioners' Federal Lands Task Force.
3 Philip S. Cook is a Research Associate with the Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Policy Analysis Group. He has an M.S. in Forest Management and Economics from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, and is a member of the Society of American Foresters.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
About the PAG
Acknowledgments
Preface
Table of Contents
List of Figures
List of Tables
Focus Questions and Brief Replies
1. Why is 64% of Idaho federal land?
2. What is the purpose of federal lands?
3. What does the law say about "ownership" of federal lands?
4. What "federalism" issues are relevant?Organization of Report
Findings
Fragmented Authority and Accountability
GridlockAnalysis of Alternatives
Current Baseline Situation (No Change)
Change Ownership of Land
Change Rules for Federal Land ManagementEconomic-based Reforms
Land Leasing
Federal Land Management Commission
Local Advisory Council
Trust Land Management
Cooperative State/Federal ManagementFramework for Comparing Alternatives
Chapter 1. Why is 64% of Idaho federal land?
Current Land Ownership and Land Use in Idaho
Land Ownership
Land UseFederal Land Eras
Disposal of the Public Domain to State and Private Ownership
Retention and Management by Federal AgenciesSummary and Conclusions
Chapter 2. What is the purpose of federal lands?
U.S. Forest Service
Policy Objectives
Planning Approaches
Idaho National Forests
Bureau of Land Management
Policy Objectives
Planning Approaches
Management: From Policy and Planning to Action
Management History
Preservation and Environmental Protection
Conflict and Confrontation
Gridlock: Management Inaction
What is "deadlock"?
What is "gridlock"?
Reasons for Gridlock
Gridlock in the National Forest System
Summary and Conclusions
Chapter 3. What does the law say about "ownership" of federal lands?
Federal Land Ownership and Law (by Arthur D. Smith, Jr.)
Title to Federal Land
Federal and State Authority Over Federal Land
Duties Imposed by Federal Ownership
Summary and Conclusions
Chapter 4. What "federalism" issues are relevant?
Cooperative Federalism and Preemption
Possible State Roles
Preemption
Revenue Sharing
Revenue-sharing Payments (25% Fund)
Payments In Lieu of Taxes (PILT)
Revenue Production from National Forest and BLM Lands
Payments to Idaho Counties
Locus of Decision Making and the "Public Interest"
What is the "public interest"?
Collaborative Process and the "Public Interest"
National Interests
State and Local Interests
Summary and Conclusions
Chapter 5. Analysis of Alternatives
Current Baseline Situation (No Change)
Current Land-use Plans and Interim Directions
Ecosystem-based Management: Preferred Draft Alternative
Resource Assessment Data
Scenic Conditions
Recreation
Rangeland Health
Forest Health
Riparian Health
Water Quality
Wildlife
Fish
Threatened and Endangered Species
Human Communities
Ecosystem-based Management as Public Policy
Summary and Conclusions
Change Ownership of Land
Land Sale
Ownership Transfer
Summary and Conclusions
Change Rules for Federal Land Management
Economic-based Reforms
Summary and Conclusions
Land Leasing
Timber Rights Leasing in Canada
Leasing Issues
Summary and Conclusions
Federal Land Management Commission
Land Law Review
Management Oversight
Summary and Conclusions
Local Advisory Council
Collaborative Planning
Forest Service and Collaborative Stewardship
Collaboration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Collaborative Learning
Quincy Library Group
BLM Resource Advisory Councils (RACs)
Concerns About Collaborative Processes
Summary and Conclusions
Trust Land Management
Key Concepts and Trust Components
Elements of a Trust
Parts of a Trust
Public Involvement
Sustainable Resource Management
Frequently Asked Questions
Summary and Conclusions
Cooperative State/Federal Management
Summary and Conclusions
Framework for Comparing Alternatives
Criteria
Preliminary Evaluation
Mixed Results
Conclusions
Conclusions
Appendix Tables (see List of Tables)
Endnotes: Legal Citations
Literature Cited
Glossary
Index
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure E-1. Idaho land ownership, 1996; percent of total by public and private sector, with federal land percent of total by agency
Figure 1-1. Federal land in Idaho, 1982-1996; with National Forest, BLM, and other federal agency ownership
Figure 1-2. Land use in Idaho
Figure 1-3. Land use on federal lands in Idaho
Figure 2-1. Idaho timber harvest, 1947-1996; with national forest contribution
Figure 2-2. National forest contribution to Idaho timber harvest, 1947-1996; as percent of total timber harvest
Figure 2-3. Domestic livestock on federal lands in Idaho, 1947-1996
Figure 2-4. Recreational use of Idaho national forests, 1947-1996
Figure 2-5. National forest administrative hierarchy, flow of funds, and public involvement
Figure 4-1. Revenue-sharing payments to Idaho counties, 1967-1997; from timber harvests on Idaho national forests, 1967-1996
Figure 5-1. Implications of fire regime changes on federal lands in Idaho, measured by historic and current lethal and nonlethal conditions as a percentage of Forest Service and BLM lands
Figure 5-2. Forest health conditions for selected Idaho national forests,1979-1995; measured by annual mortality and growth on suitable timberlands and compared to regional range, 1952-1995
Figure 5-3. Federal Land Management Commission alternative design for a national forest
Figure 5-4. Local advisory council (collaborative management) alternative design for a national forest
Figure 5-5. Trust land management alternative design for a national forest
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1. Top five states: National Forest System lands, 1996
Table 2-2. Top five states: National Wilderness Preservation System lands, 1989
Table 4-1. Forest Service and BLM Receipts and Expenditures in Idaho, 1994-1996
Table 5-1. Cumulative effects on specialized industries of alternatives considered by the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project
Table 5-2. Arguments for and against ecosystem-based management, as embodied in the Preferred Alternative of the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project
Table 5-3. Arguments for and against changing ownership by land sale or ownership transfer
Table 5-4. Arguments for and against economic-based reforms
Table 5-5. Arguments for and against leasing federal land
Table 5-6. Arguments for and against a Federal Land Management Commission
Table 5-7. Arguments for and against local advisory council (collaborative management)
Table 5-8. Legal definitions of trust terms
Table 5-9. Arguments for and against trust land management
Table 5-10. Arguments for and against cooperative state/federal management
Table 5-11. Framework for comparing alternatives for managing federal lands, with preliminary evaluations
Appendix Table A. Idaho land ownership by category of owners, 1996
Appendix Table B-1. Northern Idaho communities with wood products specialization, 1995
Appendix Table B-2. Southern Idaho communities with wood products specialization, 1995
This page last updated 8/4/98.
Report problems with this page to pcook@uidaho.edu.