Report No. 14
Idaho Water Quality Policy for Nonpoint Source Pollution: A
Manual for Decision-Makers
Executive Summary
(Part 8)
APPENDIX
Table of Contents--Full Report
- Executive Summary
(as in this document, but without imbedded tables and
figures)
- Chapter 1. What does the Clean Water Act require?
- 1.1. What are the goals of the CWA?
- 1.2. What is the difference between point sources
and nonpoint sources of pollution?
How is point source pollution controlled?
How is nonpoint source pollution controlled?
- 1.3. How has the CWA evolved?
The Water Quality Act Amendments of 1987 and
section 319
How is the Coastal Zone Management Act
reauthorization in 1990 related to the CWA?
Why did the EPA adopt a "watershed
protection" approach in 1991?
Why did Congress fail to reauthorize the CWA in
1993-1996?
- 1.4. What are the federal and state
responsibilities for nonpoint source control?
Who pays for nonpoint source control programs?
- 1.5. What mechanisms are required to meet CWA
goals?
- 1.5.9. How do TMDLs, antidegradation policy, and
BMPs function in the evolution toward watershed
management?
What is the relationship of TMDLs and BMPs?
Where is watershed management headed?
How does the antidegradation policy fit in?
- 1.6. How is the Clean Water Act related to other
policies?
- 1.6.1. What is the relationship of the CWA and
the Endangered Species Act (ESA)?
- 1.6.2. What are federal land and resource
management agencies required to do to conform to
Idaho state law?
Chapter 2. How has federal court action affected Idaho?
- 2.1. What are the citizen lawsuit provisions in
the CWA?
What does case law say about nonpoint source
pollution?
What is a TMDL lawsuit about?
How have the EPA and states responded to TMDL
lawsuits?
- 2.2. What is the history of the Idaho TMDL
lawsuit?
Expanded "303 (d)" list of water
quality-limited waters
Expedited schedule for TMDL development
- 2.3. Analysis: What are the implications of
rulings in the Idaho TMDL lawsuit?
What is the purpose of TMDLs?
Why was the lawsuit filed?
What did the Idaho Legislature do?
What did the Idaho Division of Environmental
Quality (DEQ) do?
What options are currently available?
- 2.4. What about other current CWA litigation?
- 2.5. A concise legal summary of CWA provisions
and policy
CWA standards applicable to sources of water
pollution
Water quality planning and nonpoint source
programs under the CWA
The TMDL process
Application of state water quality standards to
federal lands
BMPs vs. water quality standards
Chapter 3. What are the features of the new Idaho policy?
- 3.1. Introduction
How does the new policy address problems in the
old policy that led to court action?
Is the new policy consistent with what the CWA
requires?
Does the new policy adequately meet what the
court required?
What do the features of the new law intend to
accomplish?
- 3.2. Declaration of policy and legislative intent
- 3.3. General water quality standards and
antidegradation policy
- 3.4. Designation of instream beneficial uses
- 3.5. Reference streams or water bodies
- 3.6 Monitoring
- 3.7 Regulatory actions
- 3.8 General limitations on pollution sources
- 3.9. Basin Advisory Groups (BAGs)
- 3.10. Watershed Advisory Groups (WAGs)
- 3.11. Outstanding Resource Waters (ORWs)
- 3.12. Enforcement provisions
- 3.13. Summary and conclusions
Chapter 4. Will the new Idaho policy be effective?
- 4.1. Why is sediment Idaho's leading pollution
problem?
Where does sediment come from?
Sediment and cumulative effects
- 4.2. What CWA program elements does Idaho policy
emphasize?
BMPs
TMDLs
- 4.3. Idaho's water quality assessment and
monitoring approach
Assessing sediment
Alphabet soup: BURP, WBAG, BAG, and WAG
- 4.4. Idaho case examples
- 4.4.1. South Fork of the Salmon River
(SFSR): BMPs and cumulative effects
Descriptive history
Sedimentation processes
Cumulative effects analysis
BMP effectiveness
Idaho's first TMDL
- 4.4.2. Cumulative watershed effects (CWE)
assessment and control in Idaho
Watershed analysis and cumulative effects
Idaho's CWE process
How is BURP data used?
What control actions result from the CWE
process?
- 4.4.3. Idaho's State Agricultural Water
Quality Program (SAWQP)
- 4.4.4. Henry's Fork Watershed Council: A
model for WAGs?
Descriptive history
Council structure
Council function
- 4.5. Conclusion: BMPs and watershed protection
Protecting biological integrity
BMP evolution
Professional organization involvement
Watershed management and protection
References Cited
Cases Cited
Glossary
Index