2001 Small Grains Report
for South-central and Southeastern Idaho
Denise Wedel, Larry Robertson and Katherine O'Brien
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Idaho wheat and barley producers, through cooperative research and extension grants from the Idaho Wheat and Barley Commissions, provided partial funding for these small grain performance evaluations. Support was also provided by the University of Idaho Cooperative Extension System and by fees paid by plant breeding companies. This report represents the collective efforts of many individuals. Idaho Cooperative Extension System County Educators coordinated many of the off-station nurseries. Cooperator growers provided their time, land, and other inputs for management of these trials and appreciation is expressed to them for their support. The Idaho Wheat Quality Laboratory at Aberdeen determined the quality data for harvested wheat samples. Appreciation is also expressed to the numerous support workers who assisted with trial establishment, maintenance, harvest, grain processing, and data analysis. Finally, cereal breeders throughout the Northwest are recognized for their contributions since the nurseries would not be possible without their entries. The authors wish to thank all that have contributed to the success of this project.
Introduction
Increases in cereal grain yields result from a combination of genetic improvements in varieties and from improved agronomic practices. Studies have shown that genetic improvements have contributed more than 50 percent of the total improvement in yield over the past 30 or 40 years. The objective of the University of Idaho Small Grain Performance Trials is to provide an unbiased appraisal and evaluation of currently available varieties and advanced experimental lines. This information will assist Idaho growers in comparing and selecting varieties best suited to their particular area and growing conditions.
Varietal development programs strive not only for greater yield potential, but also for improved end-use quality, better disease and insect resistance, and yield stabilization through improved winter hardiness, better straw strength, etc. A more detailed description of variety development, cooperative extension testing and evaluation, and seed production programs is given in the University of Idaho publication titled, "Small Grain Variety Development and Adaptation in Idaho", CIS 976. Bringing a new variety to the market place is a cooperative effort by many individuals.
Varieties are best evaluated by comparing performance over a number of locations and preferably over more than one year. Varietal performance can change in response to both environmental and cultural/management conditions. This report summarizes small grain trials conducted throughout south-central and southeastern Idaho that were harvested in 2001, as well as milling and baking data from trials harvested in 2000.
Test Procedures
Locations
Cereal trials were established at four winter and eight spring locations throughout SC and SE Idaho during the fall of 2000 and the spring of 2001 (see Table 1). The Idaho Falls winter, Ririe spring, Fairfield, and Soda Springs trials were grown under dryland conditions, all other trials were grown under irrigation. The trials at Aberdeen were grown on a UI Research and Extension Center, and the remaining trials were grown in producers’ fields and received the same management inputs as the surrounding field.
Agronomic Practices
Seeding rates were set at 1,000,000 seeds per acre for all irrigated locations (800,000 seeds per acre for spring barley) and 700,000 seeds per acre for all dryland locations (600,000 seeds per acre for dryland spring barley). This seeding rate corresponds to approximately 95 and 65 pounds of seed per acre for average sized wheat and barley seed. Row spacing was set at 7 inches for all trials except the Ririe winter trial that had 14 inches between rows. All entries were replicated 3 times at each location in a randomized complete block design. All trials were established and maintained under "grower management" conditions except for the Aberdeen site that was located on the University of Idaho Research and Extension Center. Except for planting, staking, alley maintenance, and harvest operations, each nursery received the same "grower management" or cultural operations as applied to the surrounding commercial wheat or barley field. Fertilizers and pesticides applied are listed in Table 1 for the sites where the information was reported. Planting and harvesting operations by university personnel were timed to approximately coincide with corresponding cooperator operations.
Description of Data Collected
Each entry at each location was measured for grain yield, test weight, plant height, heading date, and where present, lodging. Yield was calculated for wheat at 60 pounds per bushel, 48 pounds per bushel for barley and 32 pounds per bushel for oats. Test weight is reported in pounds per standard bushel, and plant height is reported in inches from the soil surface to the tip of the heads, awns excluded. Heading date is reported as days from January 1 that 50 percent of the heads emerged from the boot, and lodging is reported as the percent of the plot area that was not standing straight prior to harvest. Spring stand is a visual rating of the total established stand on a 1-9 scale with 1 the poorest and 9 being the best. Emergence is a visual rating of speed of emergence prior to full stand establishment. This was taken at selected locations where dry soil was a factor in emergence.
Due to the time necessary to complete milling and baking evaluations, these test results are not available for the 2000 harvest. Data is given for these characteristics from the 1999 harvest.
Milling and baking tests and plump seed evaluations use standardized testing methods and are described below:
·
Flour protein, 14 percent moisture basis: this is the flour protein content, measured on a fixed 14 percent moisture basis. Lower numbers are better for soft wheat; higher numbers are preferred for hard wheat.·
Break flour yield: represents ease of milling or kernel softness; higher numbers are preferred.·
Flour yield: the percent of flour obtained from a sample of wheat; higher percentages are better.·
Whole grain protein percent: protein content of the whole grain, 12 percent moisture basis. Lower percentages are preferred for soft wheat, higher percentages are preferred for hard wheat.·
Hardness value: a measure of kernel hardness; soft wheat should be below 50; hard wheat should be above 50.·
Cookie diameter: diameter of a cookie in centimeters; larger numbers are better for soft wheat.
For hard wheat, additional dough and baking evaluations include the following:
·
Bake volume: This is the volume of an experimental loaf of bread measured in cubic centimeters, higher volume preferred.For barley:
·
Plump seed percentage is the percent of a sample that stayed on top of a 6/64 screen after shaking.·
Thin percentage is that percent of a sample that passed through a 5.5/64 screen after shaking.Statistical Interpretation
Most tables have a least significant difference (LSD) statistic at the bottom of the table. This statistic is given at the 10 percent error level and is an aid in comparing varieties. If the measured values of any two varieties within a table differ by the LSD value or more, they may be considered different with a confidence level of 90 percent. If the measured values are less than the LSD value, the differences may be due to random error rather than real differences. Coefficient of variation (CV percent) statistic is a general measurement of the precision of each experiment. Lower CV percent values indicate less experimental variation and greater precision.
Most tables that do not have the LSD and CV statistic, are averages over locations or years where specific statistical analysis was not run on the combined data or are from data that was obtained from only one replication (ex. quality data). Most tables from individual locations also contain yield data from two previous years. The average, LSD, and CV for these data represent the original data set not just the selected varieties presented in these tables.Growing Conditions and Factors Affecting Trials
Winter trials were seeded (fall of 2000) into generally good seedbeds at all irrigated locations. Normal stands were obtained, and these trials went into winter in good condition. The dryland location at Ririe was very dry, and the crop emerged from about four inches of soil coverage, and incomplete stands were obtained. Adequate stands were eventually obtained by almost all varieties. The winter was warmer than normal and no winterkill was observed. Spring seeding progressed at about average times across the southern part of the state. Good stands were obtained at all locations. The warm temperatures of the winter continued through early spring. Spring conditions had extremely variable temperatures and higher than normal winds, creating continual stress on developing plants. Summer temperatures were hotter than normal, causing the crop to ripen ahead of average. The season was generally good across the southern Idaho production area. Near ideal harvest conditions lasted through the entire grain harvest. Winter cereals were mostly normal in yield while most spring-seeded cereals were average to slightly below average. Test weights tended to be below average. On dryland where soil moisture was limited, some kernel shriveling occurred.
The Jerome and Rupert winter trials were both very productive and high yields were obtained. Winter barley at Jerome had excessive lodging. The Aberdeen winter trial lacked proper N fertilization, and yields and grain protein content were lower than normal. The Ririe winter and spring trials were stressed for moisture, and low yields were obtained. At all spring locations, very little rainfall occurred after seeding, and, consequently, all non-irrigated locations had low yields. Twin Falls spring location had very high levels of N and lodging occurred in most barley varieties, resulting in lower test weights than normal. Rupert, Aberdeen and Idaho Falls spring locations had good yields in relatively uniform fields. Ashton was very short of soil moisture early in the season, requiring irrigation much earlier than normal. The crop did tiller well and developed normally.
Seasonal average measurements of several plant growth characteristics taken from the variety trials are shown in Table 2 for the period 1991-2001. 2001 yield was somewhat below average for winter wheat and spring wheat but slightly above average for spring barley. 2001 test weight of winter wheat was near average, spring wheat was above average by almost two pounds/bushel, and spring barley was 2 pound/bushel lower than average. Plant height was shorter than average for winter wheat and both spring crops. Heading date was near average for all crops, and lodging was below average for wheat and above average for spring barley.
Varieties Tested
A list of released varieties tested in 2000-2001 is given in Table 3. Included in this table are seed size, number of seeds per pound, and the adjusted seeding rate. Information is also given on the year of release and the releasing agency or company. A short description of new varieties is given in Table 4. Additional information is available from the releasing agency or
company.